Keywords
ChatGPT
Higher Education
Mixed Methods
Instructor-AI Collaboration
UTAUT
TPACK
Ethical AI Integration
How to Cite
Abstract
Purpose: This study introduces the CHAT (ChatGPT, Holistic, Adaptive, Teaching) Framework, a contextually grounded model that integrates UTAUT, TPACK, and UNESCO’s AI in Education Policy to support ethical and effective instructor-AI collaboration. It investigates how higher education instructors in Trinidad and Tobago perceive, adopt, and integrate generative AI tools, particularly ChatGPT, within their teaching and administrative practices.
Method: An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed. A quantitative survey of 101 instructors was followed by 11 semi-structured interviews and one focus group (n = 6) to explain statistical results. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Spearman’s rho, and one-way ANOVA. Qualitative data were thematically analysed to interpret and expand quantitative findings.
Findings: Results indicated moderate adoption of ChatGPT (M = 3.47, SD = 0.81), with effort expectancy (ρ = .62, p < .01) and facilitating conditions (ρ = .57, p < .01) showing the strongest positive correlations with adoption. No significant differences emerged across gender, age, or education level (p > .05). Qualitative findings revealed enthusiasm for AI’s instructional efficiency but raised ethical concerns about plagiarism, bias, and data privacy.
Value: This study contributes an empirically grounded, human-centred framework that explains how adoption conditions, pedagogical practice, and ethical mediation interact to shape instructor-AI integration in Caribbean higher education.
Practical Implications: The CHAT Framework offers policymakers, administrators, and educators a human-centred model to guide responsible professional development initiatives and institutional strategies for equitable and sustainable AI use.
References
Ansari, A. N., Ahmad, S., & Bhutta, S. M. (2023). Mapping the global evidence around the use of ChatGPT in higher education. Education and Information Technologies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12223-4
Ba, S., Liu, Y., Chen, R., & Zhang, T. (2025). Unraveling the mechanisms and effectiveness of AI-assisted feedback in education: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education Open, 6, 100284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100284
Baksh, S. (2025). Investigating students’ AI usage through the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework: A mixed-method study in the Caribbean region. SDG Studies, 6, e036. https://doi.org/10.37497/sdgs.v6istudies.36
Bissessar, C. (2023). To use or not to use ChatGPT and assistive artificial intelligence tools in higher education institutions? The modern-day conundrum – students’ and faculty’s perspectives. Equity in Education & Society. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/27526461231215083
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9, 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Bowen, P., Rose, R., & Pilkington, A. (2017). Mixed methods—Theory and practice: Sequential, explanatory approach. The International Journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods, 5(2), 10–27. https://eajournals.org/ijqqrm/vol-5-issue-2-may-2017/mixed-methods-theory-practice-sequential-explanatory-approach/
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. APA PsycNet. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2006-06991-002
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (Fifth edition). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://cmc.marmot.org/Record/.b57955906
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. SAGE Publications Inc. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/qualitative-inquiry-and-research-design/book246896
Daly, J. (2025). AI ethics and governance in tertiary education: Global frameworks and local implications. Computers & Education Open, 8, 100188.
Fauzi, F., Tuhuteru, L., Sampe, F., Ausat, A. M. A., & Hatta, H. R. (2023). Analysing the Role of ChatGPT in Improving Student Productivity in Higher Education. Journal on Education, 5, 14886–14891. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i4.2563
Fleckenstein, J., Liebenow, L. W., & Meyer, J. (2023). Automated feedback and writing: A multi-level meta-analysis of effects on students’ performance. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 6, 1162454. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1162454
García-López, I. M., & Trujillo-Liñán, L. (2025). Ethical and regulatory challenges of generative AI in education: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1565938
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Center for Curriculum Redesign. https://curriculumredesign.org
Holstein, K., Aleven, V., & Rummel, N. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence in pedagogical practices: A systematic review of empirical studies (2022–2024). Cogent Education, 12(1), Article 2485499. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2025.2485499
Hwang, G.-J., Chiu, L.-Y., & Chen, C.-Y. (2023). Modeling teachers’ adoption of AI-powered educational tools: A study integrating UTAUT and TPACK. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 9(8), 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti9080084
Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260
Julien, G. (2024). How artificial intelligence (AI) impacts inclusive education. Educational Research and Reviews, 19(6), 95–103. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1434316.pdf.
Keith, L. R., & Waldron, L. (2024). AI-driven educational paradigm for Sustainable Development Goal 4: A Caribbean perspective. The UWI Quality Education Forum, 28, 151-171. https://journals.sta.uwi.edu/ojs/index.php/qef/issue/view/875/19
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
Madden, O. N., McKenzie, N., & Daley, J. L. (2025). Effects of ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence in higher education: Voices of Jamaican academic faculty. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 5(2). https://www.ijeh.com/article/2025-feb-jamaica-ai
Matthew J. Koehler, Punya Mishra, Kristen Kereluik, Tae Seob Shin & Charles R. Graham (2022). The technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) framework. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (5th ed., pp. 101–118). Springer. The chapter is available at SpringerLink: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_9
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., & López-Meneses, E. (2023). Impact of the Implementation of ChatGPT in Education: A Systematic Review. Computers, 12, 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12080153
Morris, S., Samuels, S., & Morris, C. (2025). Navigating tomorrow’s Jamaican classrooms: Assessing the impact of AI on teacher training during teaching practicum in Jamaica. American Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-13-1-1
Murad, I. A., Surameery, N. M. S., & Shakor, M. Y. (2023). Adopting ChatGPT to Enhance Educational Experiences. International Journal of Information Technology & Computer Engineering (IJITC) ISSN: 2455-5290, 3, 20–25. https://doi.org/10.55529/ijitc.35.20.25
Mustafa, S., Ali, W., Ameen, A., & Kumar, R. (2024). A systematic review of literature reviews on artificial intelligence in education (AIED): A roadmap to a future research agenda. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00350
Panagopoulou, F., Parpoula, C., & Karpouzis, K. (2023). Legal and ethical considerations regarding the use of ChatGPT in education. Preprint. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2306.10037
Perkins, M. (2023). Academic integrity considerations of AI Large Language Models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.02.07
Saldaña, J. (2016). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Sage. https://emotrab.ufba.br/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Saldana-2013-TheCodingManualforQualitativeResearchers.pdf
Shamsudin, N. M., & Aris, S. R. S. (2023). Perspectives of ChatGPT for Teachers Trainee Programs in Designing STEM Lesson. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v12-i3/19219
Strzelecki, A. (2023). To use or not to use ChatGPT in higher education? A study of students’ acceptance and use of technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2209881
Roberts, L. N., & Solomon, F. N. (2024). Navigating the AI landscape: Student and teacher perceptions of AI in assessments in high school and college settings. In AI-enhanced teaching methods (pp. 268–285). IGI Global. https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/navigating-the-ai-landscape/345066
Roberts, L. N. (2025). Navigating new frontiers: AI in assessments from the perspectives of teachers and students. In Effective instructional design informed by AI. IGI Global. https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/navigating-new-frontiers/369672
Slimi, Z. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence on higher education: An empirical study. European Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.19044/ejes.v10no1a17
UNESCO. (2023). Generative AI and the future of education. Unesco.org. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385877
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386693
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Vicky Dwi Wicaksono. (2022). Simplification of Lesson Plan: Elementary School Teacher Perspective. Pedagogia: Jurnal Pendidikan, 11, 77–88. https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v11i1.1477
Yakin, A. A., Muthmainnah, M., Apriani, E., Obaid, A. J., & Elngar, A. A. (2023). Transforming Online Learning Management: Generative Models on ChatGPT to Enhance Online Student Engagement Scale (OLE). Idarah (Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kependidikan), 7, 135–148. https://doi.org/10.47766/idarah.v7i2.1514
Yan, S., Sha, L., Zhao, Li, Martinez-Maldonado, V., Chen, J., Li, X., Jin, A., Gašević, D. (2024). Generative AI in higher education: A global perspective of institutional adoption policies and guidelines. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100163
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V.I., Bond, M. et al. Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators?. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 16, 39 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Sharlene Baksh