Exploring the role of AI in Higher Education: A study of usage by students and teachers in the Netherlands
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37497/rev.artif.intell.educ.v6ii.40Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence in Education, Higher education, Educational technology, AI literacy, Pedagogical integration, Ethics in AIAbstract
Purpose: This study explores the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in Dutch higher education, examining how students and teachers use these technologies in practice. It aims to assess the extent to which AI enhances educational efficiency and raises critical ethical considerations.
Design/Methodology/Approach: A quantitative research design was employed using digital questionnaires distributed among students and teachers in Dutch universities. The study analyzed usage frequency, application purposes, perceived benefits, and concerns related to AI tools in educational settings.
Findings: Results show that AI is primarily used for practical support such as text generation, editing, and lesson preparation rather than for fundamentally transforming learning or teaching methodologies. Both groups report improved efficiency and work quality but also express concerns about the reliability and ethical implications of AI-generated content.
Practical Implications: The findings highlight the urgent need for AI literacy initiatives that balance technical skills with ethical awareness. Institutions should develop targeted training programs and policies to foster responsible AI use and support its integration in both teaching and learning.
Originality/Value: By providing empirical insights into real-world AI use in higher education, this study contributes to the ongoing discourse on responsible AI integration. It underscores the importance of aligning AI adoption with pedagogical goals and ethical standards to ensure meaningful educational innovation.
References
Ajevski, M., Barker, K., Gilbert, A., Hardie, L., & Ryan, F. (2023). ChatGPT and the future of legal education and practice. The Law Teacher, 57(3), 352-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2023.2207426 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2023.2207426
Balalle, H., & Pannilage, S. (2025). Reassessing academic integrity in the age of AI: A systematic literature review on AI and academic integrity. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101299 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101299
Basch, C., Hillyer, G., Gold, B., & Yousaf, H. (2025). Understanding artificial intelligence knowledge and usage among college students: Insights from a survey on classroom, coursework, and personal applications . Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 6(i), e037. https://doi.org/10.37497/rev.artif.intell.educ.v6ii.37 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37497/rev.artif.intell.educ.v6ii.37
Batista, J., Mesquita, A., & Carnaz, G. (2024). Generative AI and higher education: Trends, challenges, and future directions from a systematic literature review. Information (Basel), 15(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/info15110676 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/info15110676
Bauer, E., Greiff, S., Graesser, A. C., Scheiter, K., & Sailer, M. (2025). Looking beyond the hype: Understanding the effects of AI on learning. Educational Psychology Review, 37(45). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10020-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10020-8
Bearman, M., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Learning to work with the black box: Pedagogy for a world with artificial intelligence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(5), 1160-1173. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13337 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13337
Boone, H. N., Jr, & Boone, D. A. (2012). Analyzing likert data. Journal of Extension, 50(2)https://doi.org/10.34068/joe.50.02.48 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34068/joe.50.02.48
Boussouf, Z., Amrani, H., Zerhouni Khal, M., & Daidai, F. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Data and Metadata, 3, 288 https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2024288 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2024288
Brignardello-Petersen, R., Santesso, N., & Guyatt, G. H. (2025). Systematic reviews of the literature: An introduction to current methods. American Journal of Epidemiology, 194(2), 536-542. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39038802/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae232
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research : Pbk (3rd, International student ed.). Sage.
de Fine Licht, K. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence in higher education: Why the 'banning approach' to student use is sometimes morally justified. Philosophy & Technology, 37(3), 113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00799-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00799-9
Gillani, N., Eynon, R., Chiabaut, C., & Finkel, K. (2023). Unpacking the “Black Box” of AI in Education. Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 99-111. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202301_26(1).0008
Jahić, I., Ebner, M., Schön, S., & Edelsbrunner, S. (2024). Exploring the use of generative AI in education: Broadening the scope. In A. Ioannou, & P. Zaphiris (Eds.), Learning and collaboration technologies (pp. 283-304). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61691-4_19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61691-4_19
Kim, C. (2025). Understanding factors influencing generative AI use intention: A Bayesian network-based probabilistic structural equation model approach. Electronics (Basel), 14(3). https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/14/3/530 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14030530
Kong, H., Yuan, Y., Baruch, Y., Bu, N., Jiang, X., & Wang, K. (2024). Influences of artificial intelligence (AI) awareness on career competency and job burnout. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 36(3), 1011–1030. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-07-2020-0789).
Kurban, C. F., & Şahin, M. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT on higher education: Exploring the AI revolution (1st ed.). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781837976478 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83797-647-820241001
Lawasi, M.C., Rohman, V.A., & Shoreamanis, M. (2024). The Use of AI in Improving Student's Critical Thinking Skills. Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities. https://doi.org/10.30595/pssh.v18i.1279 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30595/pssh.v18i.1279
Li, F., He, Y., & Xue, Q. (2021). Progress, challenges and countermeasures of adaptive learning: A systematic review. Educational Technology ＆ Society, 24(3), 238-255. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202107_24(3).0017
Long, D., Teachey, A., & Magerko, B. (2022). Family Learning Talk in AI Literacy Learning Activities. Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502091 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502091
Mah, D. K., & Groß, N. (2024). Artificial intelligence in higher education: exploring faculty use, self-efficacy, distinct profiles, and professional development needs. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00490-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00490-1
Nartey, E. K. (2024). Guiding principles of generative AI for employability and learning in UK universities. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2357898. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2357898 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2357898
Nikolic, S., Wentworth, I., Sheridan, L., Moss, S., Duursma, E., Jones, R. A., Ros, M., & Middleton, R. (2024). A systematic literature review of attitudes, intentions and behaviours of teaching academics pertaining to AI and generative AI (GenAI) in higher education: An analysis of GenAI adoption using the UTAUT framework. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 40(6), 56. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.9643 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.9643
Rowell, C. (2024). In Abegglen S., Nerantzi C., Martinez-Arboleda A. and Atenas J.(Eds.), Towards AI literacy: 101+ creative and critical practices, perspectives and purposes. creativeHE.
Santos, O., & Radanliev, P. (2024). Beyond the algorithm: AI, security, privacy, and ethics ([First]. ed.). Addison-Wesley.
Shah, P. (2023). AI and the future of education: Teaching in the age of artificial intelligence (First;1; ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Szcyrek, S., Stewart, B., & Miklas, E. (2024). Educators’ understandings of digital classroom tools and datafication: Perceptions from higher education faculty. Research in Learning Technology, 32, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v32.3040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v32.3040
Slimi, Z. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence on higher education: An empirical study. European Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(1), 1-17. Deusto University-Spain, National University of Sciences and Technology Oman. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1384682.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.19044/ejes.v10no1a24
Treve, M. (2024). Integrating artificial intelligence in education: Impacts on student learning and innovation. International Journal of Vocational Education and Training Research, 10(2). https://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/article/10.11648/j.ijvetr.20241002.14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijvetr.20241002.14
Walter, Y. (2024). Embracing the future of Artificial Intelligence in the classroom: the relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3
Zhu, W., Huang, L., Zhou, X., Li, X., Shi, G., Ying, J., & Wang, C. (2025). Could AI ethical anxiety, perceived ethical risks and ethical awareness about AI influence university students' use of generative AI products? an ethical perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 41(1), 742-764. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2323277 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2323277
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nynke Bos, Klaas-Jan Lammers, Andrea Prince van Leeuwen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
2. The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
3. The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
4. The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
6. Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
7. Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
• 8. Authors are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed
